A Comparative Analysis of Linear Regression and XGBoost Algorithms for Predicting GPU Prices Using Technical Specifications

Authors

  • Dendi Putra Prakoso Program of Information System, faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Irfan Institute of Banking and Finance, Bahauddin Zakariya University Bosan Road Multan, Multan, Pakistan
  • Quba Siddique Institute of Banking and Finance, Bahauddin Zakariya University Bosan Road Multan, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47738/ijiis.v7i4.228

Keywords:

GPU, XGBoost, Linear Regression, Price Prediction, Machine Learning, Technical Specifications

Abstract

This study investigates and compares the predictive performance of Linear Regression and XGBoost algorithms in estimating Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) prices based on their technical specifications. GPU prices are known for their high volatility, influenced not only by hardware characteristics—such as memory capacity, clock speed, and bandwidth—but also by external market factors including demand from the gaming industry, machine learning applications, and cryptocurrency mining activities. The dataset used in this research comprises 475 GPU units from three leading manufacturers—NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel Arc—featuring 15 technical attributes obtained from publicly accessible data sources. Adopting an experimental quantitative approach, the dataset was divided into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 ratio. The data preprocessing phase involved handling missing values, detecting outliers through the Interquartile Range (IQR) method, performing data normalization, and encoding categorical features. The models were evaluated using four performance metrics: the Coefficient of Determination (R²), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms Linear Regression, achieving an R² of 0.8129, MAE of 85.07 USD, RMSE of 122.03 USD, and MAPE of 35.23%. In comparison, the Linear Regression model recorded an R² of 0.7629, MAE of 106.59 USD, RMSE of 137.38 USD, and MAPE of 56.04%. The superior performance of XGBoost can be attributed to its ability to model non-linear relationships and capture complex feature interactions among GPU specifications.

References

H. Va, M. H. Choi, and M. Hong, “Efficient Simulation of Volumetric Deformable Objects in Unity3D: GPU-Accelerated Position-Based Dynamics,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 10, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12102229.

R. Holla M and D. Suma, “An effective GPU-based random grid secret sharing using an autoencoder image super-resolution,” Cogent Eng, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2024.2390134.

D. C. Youvan, “Parallel Precision: The Role of GPUs in the Acceleration of Artificial Intelligence”, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21937.76641.

A. Belkhiri and M. Dagenais, “Analyzing GPU Performance in Virtualized Environments: A Case Study,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 3, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16030072.

T. Cao, Y. Pan, H. Chen, J. Zheng, and T. Hu, “PPChain: A Blockchain for Pandemic Prevention and Control Assisted by Federated Learning,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080965.

Q. Zhang, X. Li, and P. Gao, “Forecasting Sales in Live-Streaming Cross-Border E-Commerce in the UK Using the Temporal Fusion Transformer Model,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 92, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/jtaer20020092.

J. Jang, Y. Son, and S. Lee, “A Numerical Study of an Ellipsoidal Nanoparticles under High Vacuum Using the DSMC Method,” Micromachines (Basel), vol. 14, no. 4, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/mi14040778.

D. ; Galván-González, S. R. ; Herrera-Sandoval, N. D. ; Guzman-Avalos, P. ; Pacheco-Ibarra, and J. J. ; Domínguez-Mota, “Citation: Molinero-Hernández,” 2024, doi: 10.3390/computation.

R. Limas Sierra, J. D. Guerrero-Balaguera, J. E. R. Condia, and M. Sonza Reorda, “Exploring Hardware Fault Impacts on Different Real Number Representations of the Structural Resilience of TCUs in GPUs †,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 3, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13030578.

K. M S, H. Rajaguru, and A. R. Nair, “Evaluation and Exploration of Machine Learning and Convolutional Neural Network Classifiers in Detection of Lung Cancer from Microarray Gene—A Paradigm Shift,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 8, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080933.

H. Wei, Q. Song, C. Dan, Z. He, H. Li, and M. Pu, “Performance Evaluation of ARIMA, Autoformer, and Symmetric LSTNFCL Models for Traffic Accident Emergency Prediction,” Symmetry (Basel), vol. 17, no. 5, p. 639, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/sym17050639.

T. O. Kehinde, S. H. Chung, and F. T. S. Chan, “Benchmarking TPU and GPU for Stock Price Forecasting Using LSTM Model Development,” in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2023, pp. 289–306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-37717-4_20.

R. F. Hadi, S. Sa’adah, and D. Adytia, “Forecasting of GPU Prices Using Transformer Method,” Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 136–144, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v12i1.1569.

M. N. Pangestu, M. Jajuli, and U. Enri, “Prediksi Harga Kartu Grafis NVIDIA Berdasarkan Pengaruh Harga Cryptocurrency Menggunakan Support Vector Regression,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 280–287, 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7076540.

M. H. Abbasi et al., “Predicting The Price Of Used Electronic Devices Using Machine Learning Techniques.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377526585

L. Yan, “Predicting House Prices with a Linear Regression Model,” 2024, doi: 10.54254/2755-2721/114/2024.18220.

P. Tian, “Research On Laptop Price Predictive Model Based on Linear Regression, Random Forest and Xgboost,” 2024.

S. Ballamudi, “International Journal of Robotics and Machine Learning Technologies Journal homepage: www.sciforce.org Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Laptop Price Prediction An Evaluation of Linear Regression, Histogram Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost Approaches”, doi: 10.55124/jmms.v1i1.234.

S. Adrianty and F. Maspiyanti, “Laptop Price Prediction Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm,” Journal of Applied Research In Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 132–148, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.61098/jarcis.v2i1.173.

M. Gautam, “crypto price prediction using lstm+xgboost,” Jun. 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22055

J. Shi and Y. Elkhatib, “Accurate GPU Memory Prediction for Deep Learning Jobs through Dynamic Analysis,” Apr. 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03887

K. Yeung, “ARIMA Model Application in Predicting NVIDIA’s Stock Price,” 2024, doi: 10.54254/2754-1169/128/2024.18620.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

Issue

Section

Articles